More destinations are added after they pass verification

Direct or via a stop: what each routing costs you

Last verified: 2026-08-25

Three routings, not two

“Direct versus transit” is really three cases, and the middle one is where people go wrong.

DirectTransit (stays on the plane)Transhipment (changes plane)
Countries allowed—allapproved countries only
Extra approvalsnonenoneyou must check with that country’s authority
Animal leaves the aircraftnonoyes — but not the international side of the airport
Supervision required——the competent authority of that country
Holding time——unknown; the department cannot control it
Temperature exposuredeparture + arrivaldeparture + arrivalplus every ground stop
Risk if wrong——the animal may not be eligible for import

Direct is simpler than it is available

Every routing ends at Melbourne — no other Australian airport, and no domestic connection to reach it. Combined with the fact that only some carriers accept live animals on some routes, a genuinely direct flight from your city may not exist.

Where it does, it removes an entire category of risk: no transhipment approvals, no holding facility, no second and third thermometer.

Transit costs you nothing extra

If the aircraft merely touches down and your animal stays on board on the international side of the airport, no additional requirement applies — and this is permitted in all countries. A technical stop is not a transhipment.

When comparing itineraries, establish which kind of stop each one is. The booking screen will not tell you.

Transhipment is where the work is

Change of aircraft is allowed only in an approved country, with the animal kept on the international side, under the supervision of that country’s competent authority, and away from contact with other animals.

Then the part that is delegated to you: contact the competent authority of that country and establish whether animals may tranship there, whether a holding facility exists, how long animals may be held, and whether extra conditions apply. If those conditions are not met, the animal may not be eligible for import — and that is discovered in Melbourne, after the flight.

Add the exposure nobody controls: the department states plainly that it cannot control how long an animal is held at such a stop, and each additional ground segment is another place a carrier temperature embargo can apply.

How to choose

  1. Prefer fewer aircraft changes, and pay for it if you must.
  2. Ask which stops are transit and which are transhipment — for every leg.
  3. If transhipment is unavoidable, start the competent-authority enquiry early. It is your job, it takes time, and it can invalidate a routing.
  4. Count the thermometers. More ground stops mean more chances of an embargo on the day.
  5. Weigh it against the animal. For a sick or elderly animal, the holding time at a transhipment stop is the strongest argument for a costlier, simpler routing.

What this page does not compare

Check your itinerary

Sources